DEPUTY ENGINEER KESHOD vs GOVINDBHAI RAMBHAI DANGAR — 128/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 13th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN080009632024
Filing Number
128/2024
Filing Date
12-Jul-2024
Registration No
128/2024
Registration Date
12-Jul-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEPUTY ENGINEER KESHOD
Adv. H D DEVANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVINDBHAI RAMBHAI DANGAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCS-128/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd.'s suit against defendant Govindbhai Rambhai Dangar for electricity dues recovery. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 48,667.84 (reducing the claimed Rs. 49,667.84 by disallowing Rs. 1,000 legal notice charges lacking legal basis) plus 6% simple interest per annum from the suit filing date until realization, along with court costs. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant committed electricity theft by installing an additional yellow wire to bypass the meter, as documented in inspection report No. 432 dated 20/10/2021. The defendant failed to pay outstanding regular bills (Rs. 37,625.89), a power theft supplementary bill (Rs. 36,377.36), and delayed payment charges (Rs. 11,242.15 from April 2022–April 2024), leading to permanent disconnection on 26/03/2022. Proceeding ex-parte due to the defendant's non-appearance, the unchallenged plaintiff evidence proved liability, though the legal notice charges claim was rejected for lack of contractual justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Aug-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jun-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-May-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Feb-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Dec-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Oct-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Sep-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Sep-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 128/2024
Case Summary: RCS-128/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd.'s suit against defendant Govindbhai Rambhai Dangar for electricity dues recovery. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 48,667.84 (reducing the claimed Rs. 49,667.84 by disallowing Rs. 1,000 legal notice charges lacking legal basis) plus 6% simple interest per annum from the suit filing date until realization, along with court costs. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant committed electricity theft by installing an additional yellow wire to bypass the meter, as documented in inspection report No. 432 dated 20/10/2021. The defendant failed to pay outstanding regular bills (Rs. 37,625.89), a power theft supplementary bill (Rs. 36,377.36), and delayed payment charges (Rs. 11,242.15 from April 2022–April 2024), leading to permanent disconnection on 26/03/2022. Proceeding ex-parte due to the defendant's non-appearance, the unchallenged plaintiff evidence proved liability, though the legal notice charges claim was rejected for lack of contractual justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts