Government of Gujarat vs DINESHBHAI KRASHNADAS MUCHADIYA — 211/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080002802026

Filing Number

211/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

211/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250853

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI KRASHNADAS MUCHADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Dineshbhai Krishnadas Muchadiya under Section 275(b) of the IPC and the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 65(1)(b), imposing a fine of ₹100.50 with an alternative simple imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's plea of poverty, family responsibility, and reformation prospects, and ordered forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Dineshbhai Krishnadas Muchadiya under Section 275(b) of the IPC and the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 65(1)(b), imposing a fine of ₹100.50 with an alternative simple imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's plea of poverty, family responsibility, and reformation prospects, and ordered forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case