Government of Gujarat vs RAJESHBHAI KANJIBHAI VAGHELA — 204/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080002732026

Filing Number

204/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

204/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250881

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI KANJIBHAI VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Rajeshbhai Kanjibhai Vaghela (204/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 56(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹100.50 or, in default, seven days simple imprisonment. The court also ordered forfeiture of valuables and recovery of vehicles and penalty amounts, considering the accused's plea of guilt and impoverished circumstances along with his promise of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Rajeshbhai Kanjibhai Vaghela (204/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 56(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹100.50 or, in default, seven days simple imprisonment. The court also ordered forfeiture of valuables and recovery of vehicles and penalty amounts, considering the accused's plea of guilt and impoverished circumstances along with his promise of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case