Government of Gujarat vs RAHULBHAI RAMDEBHAI MODEDARA MER — 203/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080002722026

Filing Number

203/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

203/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250898

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHULBHAI RAMDEBHAI MODEDARA MER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Rahulbhai Ramdebhai Modedara under Gujarat Prohibition Act section 65(1)(b) for unlawful possession of liquor. Considering the accused's plea of guilty, his poor financial circumstances, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or two days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum prescribed penalty, applying principles established in prior Gujarat High Court precedent regarding proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Rahulbhai Ramdebhai Modedara under Gujarat Prohibition Act section 65(1)(b) for unlawful possession of liquor. Considering the accused's plea of guilty, his poor financial circumstances, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or two days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum prescribed penalty, applying principles established in prior Gujarat High Court precedent regarding proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case