Government of Gujarat vs AJAYBHAI DEVRAJBHAI MAKADIYA — 133/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001492026

Filing Number

133/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

133/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250613

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAYBHAI DEVRAJBHAI MAKADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 133/2026 Summary The court convicted Ajaybhai Devrajbhai Makadiya under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹100 or, in default, two days simple imprisonment. The court found the accused guilty of violating prohibition laws and ordered forfeiture of seized valuables, vehicles, and penalty amounts to the government, while accepting the accused's plea regarding his economic hardship and reformation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 133/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 133/2026 Summary The court convicted Ajaybhai Devrajbhai Makadiya under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹100 or, in default, two days simple imprisonment. The court found the accused guilty of violating prohibition laws and ordered forfeiture of seized valuables, vehicles, and penalty amounts to the government, while accepting the accused's plea regarding his economic hardship and reformation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case