Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI HEMRAJBHAI MAKADIYA — 132/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001482026

Filing Number

132/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

132/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250614

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI HEMRAJBHAI MAKADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Bharat Hemrajbhai Makadiya under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or in default, two days simple imprisonment, after the accused admitted to the charges and pleaded for leniency citing his poor economic condition and family responsibilities. The court found the accused's confession voluntary and genuine, warranting the reduced sentence as a measure of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Bharat Hemrajbhai Makadiya under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or in default, two days simple imprisonment, after the accused admitted to the charges and pleaded for leniency citing his poor economic condition and family responsibilities. The court found the accused's confession voluntary and genuine, warranting the reduced sentence as a measure of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case