Government of Gujarat vs MANOJBHAI KACHARABHAI MAKWANA — 131/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001472026

Filing Number

131/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

131/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1120303025640

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOJBHAI KACHARABHAI MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Manojbhai Kacharabhai Makwana under Section 55(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹10,045 with default imprisonment of two days. The court found the accused guilty based on his own confession and voluntary plea, and considering mitigating circumstances including his lower economic status and family responsibilities, awarded the prescribed punishment while ordering confiscation of valuables and vehicles as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Manojbhai Kacharabhai Makwana under Section 55(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹10,045 with default imprisonment of two days. The court found the accused guilty based on his own confession and voluntary plea, and considering mitigating circumstances including his lower economic status and family responsibilities, awarded the prescribed punishment while ordering confiscation of valuables and vehicles as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case