Government of Gujarat vs MANSHUKHBHAI NATHUBHAI CHUDASAMA — 129/2026
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080001452026
Filing Number
129/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
129/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250690
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANSHUKHBHAI NATHUBHAI CHUDASAMA
PRATAPBHAI VIRAJIBHAI KHIMANI
AMITBHAI NAGABHAI VADHER
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted three accused (Manshukhbhai Nathubhai Chudasama, Pratapbhai Virajibhai Khimani, and Amitbhai Nagabhai Vadher) under Gujarat Police Act Section 12 and imposed individual fines of ₹100 (with an additional total fine of ₹300), with provision for simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused guilty based on their confessions and the circumstances of the case, while granting consideration for their poor economic status and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted three accused (Manshukhbhai Nathubhai Chudasama, Pratapbhai Virajibhai Khimani, and Amitbhai Nagabhai Vadher) under Gujarat Police Act Section 12 and imposed individual fines of ₹100 (with an additional total fine of ₹300), with provision for simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court found the accused guilty based on their confessions and the circumstances of the case, while granting consideration for their poor economic status and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts