Government of Gujarat vs LILUBEN LAXMANBHAI PARMAR — 127/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001432026

Filing Number

127/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250707

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LILUBEN LAXMANBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Liluben Laxmanbhai Parmar under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an offense related to illicit liquor. The court sentenced the accused to rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500, and in default of payment, to simple imprisonment for two days. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's indigent economic status and family circumstances while imposing the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Liluben Laxmanbhai Parmar under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an offense related to illicit liquor. The court sentenced the accused to rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500, and in default of payment, to simple imprisonment for two days. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's indigent economic status and family circumstances while imposing the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case