Government of Gujarat vs LAKSMANBHAI KHIMABHAI LADAK — 123/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001392026

Filing Number

123/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

123/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250739

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKSMANBHAI KHIMABHAI LADAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Laksmanbhai Khimabhai Ladak (123/2026) The court convicted the accused Laksmanbhai Khimabhai Ladak under Section 65(a) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 with a default imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied reformative principles and considered the accused's circumstances (poverty, family responsibility, and remorse) in imposing a lenient sentence, following precedent from Gujarat High Court 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Laksmanbhai Khimabhai Ladak (123/2026) The court convicted the accused Laksmanbhai Khimabhai Ladak under Section 65(a) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 with a default imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied reformative principles and considered the accused's circumstances (poverty, family responsibility, and remorse) in imposing a lenient sentence, following precedent from Gujarat High Court 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case