Government of Gujarat vs RINABEN MUKESHBHIA DEVDHARIYA — 115/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A,81. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080001302026
Filing Number
115/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
115/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250706
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RINABEN MUKESHBHIA DEVDHARIYA
-
2.HANSABEN VIKRAMBHAI PARADI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted both respondents, Rinaben Mukeshbhai Devdhariya and Hansaben Vikrambhai Paradi, under Section 65(a)(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for imparting student-type offenses. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 500 (or in default, one day simple imprisonment) and Rs. 1,000 (or in default, two days simple imprisonment), while considering their socioeconomic circumstances, family responsibilities, and lack of prior criminal record as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 115/2026
The court convicted both respondents, Rinaben Mukeshbhai Devdhariya and Hansaben Vikrambhai Paradi, under Section 65(a)(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for imparting student-type offenses. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 500 (or in default, one day simple imprisonment) and Rs. 1,000 (or in default, two days simple imprisonment), while considering their socioeconomic circumstances, family responsibilities, and lack of prior criminal record as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts