Government of Gujarat vs PRAKASHBHAI BALUBHAI PARMAR — 112/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001272026

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250780

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHBHAI BALUBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Prakashbhai Balubhai Parmar under Section 65(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol, sentencing him to imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100 with alternative imprisonment. The court considered the accused's socioeconomic circumstances, poverty, and family dependency while imposing the sentence, applying judicial discretion to impose a lenient penalty balanced against the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Prakashbhai Balubhai Parmar under Section 65(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol, sentencing him to imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100 with alternative imprisonment. The court considered the accused's socioeconomic circumstances, poverty, and family dependency while imposing the sentence, applying judicial discretion to impose a lenient penalty balanced against the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case