JAMNADAS MAVABHAI @ MAVJIBHAI KOTHADIYA vs ODHAVJIBHAI NATHUBHAI KOTHADIYA Advocate - J D MEHTA — 7/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN080001272025

Filing Number

7/2025

Filing Date

24-Jan-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

24-Jan-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAMNADAS MAVABHAI @ MAVJIBHAI KOTHADIYA

    Adv. P J MESWANIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ODHAVJIBHAI NATHUBHAI KOTHADIYA Advocate - J D MEHTA

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 07/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Court, Keshod Petitioner: Jamnadas Mavabhai @ Mavjibhai Kothadiya Respondent: Odhavjibhai Nathubhai Kothadiya Outcome: Petition Dismissed The petitioner sought a temporary injunction (interim relief) to secure his right to use a 10-foot-wide, 150-meter-long agricultural pathway across the respondent's land to access his own field. The court found the petitioner failed to establish all three essential requirements for interim relief: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in his favor, and (3) irreparable harm. The court dismissed the petition with costs to follow the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 25-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 11-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 05-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 15-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 31-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 24-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 07/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Court, Keshod Petitioner: Jamnadas Mavabhai @ Mavjibhai Kothadiya Respondent: Odhavjibhai Nathubhai Kothadiya Outcome: Petition Dismissed The petitioner sought a temporary injunction (interim relief) to secure his right to use a 10-foot-wide, 150-meter-long agricultural pathway across the respondent's land to access his own field. The court found the petitioner failed to establish all three essential requirements for interim relief: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in his favor, and (3) irreparable harm. The court dismissed the petition with costs to follow the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case