Government of Gujarat vs KAMLESHBHAI DEEPAKBHAI CHOUHAN — 110/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080001252026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250476
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAMLESHBHAI DEEPAKBHAI CHOUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted Kamleshbhai Deepakbhai Chouhan under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for being found in possession of liquor while in an intoxicated state. The court imposed a sentence of Rs. 100 (or one day simple imprisonment if unable to pay) after considering the accused's guilty plea, socioeconomic circumstances, family dependence, and hardship a criminal conviction would cause. The decision drew on established sentencing principles from Gujarat High Court precedent regarding proportionality and mitigation factors in prohibition-related offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2026
The court convicted Kamleshbhai Deepakbhai Chouhan under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for being found in possession of liquor while in an intoxicated state. The court imposed a sentence of Rs. 100 (or one day simple imprisonment if unable to pay) after considering the accused's guilty plea, socioeconomic circumstances, family dependence, and hardship a criminal conviction would cause. The decision drew on established sentencing principles from Gujarat High Court precedent regarding proportionality and mitigation factors in prohibition-related offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts