Government of Gujarat vs KAMLESHBHAI DEEPAKBHAI CHOUHAN — 110/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001252026

Case disposed

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

08-01-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

08-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250476

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KAMLESHBHAI DEEPAKBHAI CHOUHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

20-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted Kamleshbhai Deepakbhai Chouhan under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for being found in possession of liquor while in an intoxicated state. The court imposed a sentence of Rs. 100 (or one day simple imprisonment if unable to pay) after considering the accused's guilty plea, socioeconomic circumstances, family dependence, and hardship a criminal conviction would cause. The decision drew on established sentencing principles from Gujarat High Court precedent regarding proportionality and mitigation factors in prohibition-related offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Kamleshbhai Deepakbhai Chouhan under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for being found in possession of liquor while in an intoxicated state. The court imposed a sentence of Rs. 100 (or one day simple imprisonment if unable to pay) after considering the accused's guilty plea, socioeconomic circumstances, family dependence, and hardship a criminal conviction would cause. The decision drew on established sentencing principles from Gujarat High Court precedent regarding proportionality and mitigation factors in prohibition-related offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case