Government of Gujarat vs DILIPBHAI NANJIBHAI BATAVIYA — 109/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001242026

Filing Number

109/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

109/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250821

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILIPBHAI NANJIBHAI BATAVIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Dilipbhai Nanjibhai Bataviya under Section 54(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol in an educational institution. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or in default, simple imprisonment for 2 days, taking into account mitigating factors such as his poverty, family responsibilities, and lack of prior knowledge of law, while considering principles established in prior judicial precedent to impose a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Dilipbhai Nanjibhai Bataviya under Section 54(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol in an educational institution. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or in default, simple imprisonment for 2 days, taking into account mitigating factors such as his poverty, family responsibilities, and lack of prior knowledge of law, while considering principles established in prior judicial precedent to impose a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case