Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI BARIYA — 107/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080001222026
Filing Number
107/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
107/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250794
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI BARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai Karshanbhai Bariya (Case 107/2026) The court convicted accused Sureshbhai Karshanbhai Bariya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,004 or six months imprisonment in default. The court found the accused guilty based on his own confession and considering mitigating circumstances such as his impoverished background and family responsibilities, granting him the benefit of reformation under applicable judicial precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai Karshanbhai Bariya (Case 107/2026) The court convicted accused Sureshbhai Karshanbhai Bariya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,004 or six months imprisonment in default. The court found the accused guilty based on his own confession and considering mitigating circumstances such as his impoverished background and family responsibilities, granting him the benefit of reformation under applicable judicial precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts