Government of Gujarat vs BHARAT BABUBHAI SARVIYA — 106/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080001212026
Filing Number
106/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
106/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250922
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHARAT BABUBHAI SARVIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The court convicted Bharat Babubhai Sarviya under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for being in possession of alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty and confessed to the offense. Considering the accused's socio-economic circumstances—he is poor, an uneducated person, sole earner for his family, and the conviction's impact on his dependents—the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or, in default, 2 days simple imprisonment, rather than the maximum penalty, exercising discretionary leniency under established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court convicted Bharat Babubhai Sarviya under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for being in possession of alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty and confessed to the offense. Considering the accused's socio-economic circumstances—he is poor, an uneducated person, sole earner for his family, and the conviction's impact on his dependents—the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or, in default, 2 days simple imprisonment, rather than the maximum penalty, exercising discretionary leniency under established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts