Government of Gujarat vs MUKESHBHAI RAMBHAI DANGAR — 101/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001162026

Filing Number

101/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250752

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI RAMBHAI DANGAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Mukeshbhai Rambhai Dangar under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for the offense of abetment of illicit liquor. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment of two days in default, considering his socioeconomic circumstances, family responsibilities, and the hardship the sentence would impose on his dependents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Mukeshbhai Rambhai Dangar under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for the offense of abetment of illicit liquor. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment of two days in default, considering his socioeconomic circumstances, family responsibilities, and the hardship the sentence would impose on his dependents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case