Government of Gujarat vs SAGARBHAI NITINBHAI PIPALIYA — 98/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001132026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

98/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250762

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAGARBHAI NITINBHAI PIPALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Sagarbhai Nitinbhai Pipaliya under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default), considering mitigating factors including his illiteracy, first offense, poverty, sole earning member status, and family hardship, thus imposing a lenient sentence below the statutory maximum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Sagarbhai Nitinbhai Pipaliya under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default), considering mitigating factors including his illiteracy, first offense, poverty, sole earning member status, and family hardship, thus imposing a lenient sentence below the statutory maximum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case