Government of Gujarat vs MANOJBHAI ARJANBHAI DEVDHARIYA — 91/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001062026

Filing Number

91/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

91/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250568

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOJBHAI ARJANBHAI DEVDHARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Manojbhai Arjanbhai Devdhariya under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 64(1)(b), and sentenced him to a fine of ₹10,045 (alternatively, 2 days simple imprisonment if fine is unpaid). The court found the accused guilty of the offense after considering his plea of guilty and his background as a poor person with family responsibilities, while also noting his admission of guilt and request for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 91/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Manojbhai Arjanbhai Devdhariya under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 64(1)(b), and sentenced him to a fine of ₹10,045 (alternatively, 2 days simple imprisonment if fine is unpaid). The court found the accused guilty of the offense after considering his plea of guilty and his background as a poor person with family responsibilities, while also noting his admission of guilt and request for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case