Government of Gujarat vs NANJIBHAI LAXMANBHAI VADARIYA — 88/2026
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080001032026
Filing Number
88/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
88/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250677
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NANJIBHAI LAXMANBHAI VADARIYA
MAGANBHAI MOHANBHAI HISU
HIRABHAI DHARMSIBHAI DUDHATRA
RAJABHAI GAGABHAI ODEDARA
BHARATBHAI VASHRAMBHAI GAREJA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted all five accused persons under Section 12 of the Gambling Act for illegal gambling. The accused confessed voluntarily to the charges, and considering mitigating factors—this being their first offense, family responsibilities, genuine remorse, and assurance of reform—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine each (or simple imprisonment of 3 days if unpaid) rather than the maximum penalty, believing rehabilitation was possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted all five accused persons under Section 12 of the Gambling Act for illegal gambling. The accused confessed voluntarily to the charges, and considering mitigating factors—this being their first offense, family responsibilities, genuine remorse, and assurance of reform—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine each (or simple imprisonment of 3 days if unpaid) rather than the maximum penalty, believing rehabilitation was possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts