Government of Gujarat vs NANJIBHAI LAXMANBHAI VADARIYA — 88/2026

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080001032026

Case disposed

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

08-01-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

08-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250677

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 [SECTION 1 18] Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NANJIBHAI LAXMANBHAI VADARIYA

MAGANBHAI MOHANBHAI HISU

HIRABHAI DHARMSIBHAI DUDHATRA

RAJABHAI GAGABHAI ODEDARA

BHARATBHAI VASHRAMBHAI GAREJA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

20-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted all five accused persons under Section 12 of the Gambling Act for illegal gambling. The accused confessed voluntarily to the charges, and considering mitigating factors—this being their first offense, family responsibilities, genuine remorse, and assurance of reform—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine each (or simple imprisonment of 3 days if unpaid) rather than the maximum penalty, believing rehabilitation was possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted all five accused persons under Section 12 of the Gambling Act for illegal gambling. The accused confessed voluntarily to the charges, and considering mitigating factors—this being their first offense, family responsibilities, genuine remorse, and assurance of reform—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine each (or simple imprisonment of 3 days if unpaid) rather than the maximum penalty, believing rehabilitation was possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case