Government of Gujarat vs EBRAHIMBHAI ABABHAI SIDA — 83/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000982026

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250879

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.EBRAHIMBHAI ABABHAI SIDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the respondent Ebrahimbhai Ababhai Sida under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for recklessly causing danger to human life by leaving his vehicle on a public road in a manner that obstructed traffic. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative imprisonment of two days, considering his poor financial condition and first-time offense while warning against future repetition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent Ebrahimbhai Ababhai Sida under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for recklessly causing danger to human life by leaving his vehicle on a public road in a manner that obstructed traffic. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative imprisonment of two days, considering his poor financial condition and first-time offense while warning against future repetition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case