Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHIA KANTIBHAI SODHA — 80/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000952026

Case disposed

Filing Number

80/2026

Filing Date

08-01-2026

Registration No

80/2026

Registration Date

08-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250861

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SURESHBHIA KANTIBHAI SODHA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

20-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhia Kantibhai Sodha (Case 80/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 54(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illicit liquor possession and sentenced him to imprisonment for 2 days (in lieu of fine default) and a fine of Rs. 100, applying sentencing principles that considered his impoverished economic status and family hardship. The judgment applied precedent from the 2005 Gujarat High Court case establishing that courts should consider the accused's socioeconomic circumstances and the collateral impact on dependents when determining appropriate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhia Kantibhai Sodha (Case 80/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 54(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illicit liquor possession and sentenced him to imprisonment for 2 days (in lieu of fine default) and a fine of Rs. 100, applying sentencing principles that considered his impoverished economic status and family hardship. The judgment applied precedent from the 2005 Gujarat High Court case establishing that courts should consider the accused's socioeconomic circumstances and the collateral impact on dependents when determining appropriate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case