Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHIA KANTIBHAI SODHA — 80/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080000952026
Filing Number
80/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
80/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250861
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHIA KANTIBHAI SODHA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhia Kantibhai Sodha (Case 80/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 54(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illicit liquor possession and sentenced him to imprisonment for 2 days (in lieu of fine default) and a fine of Rs. 100, applying sentencing principles that considered his impoverished economic status and family hardship. The judgment applied precedent from the 2005 Gujarat High Court case establishing that courts should consider the accused's socioeconomic circumstances and the collateral impact on dependents when determining appropriate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhia Kantibhai Sodha (Case 80/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 54(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illicit liquor possession and sentenced him to imprisonment for 2 days (in lieu of fine default) and a fine of Rs. 100, applying sentencing principles that considered his impoverished economic status and family hardship. The judgment applied precedent from the 2005 Gujarat High Court case establishing that courts should consider the accused's socioeconomic circumstances and the collateral impact on dependents when determining appropriate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts