Government of Gujarat vs KARABHAI ARJANBHAI PARMAR — 65/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000762026

Filing Number

65/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030240876

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARABHAI ARJANBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 65/2026 The court convicted respondent Karabhai Arjanbhai Parmar under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternate imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court, relying on precedent and considering the accused's plea of guilt and impoverished circumstances, granted him the opportunity for reformation while imposing the minimal prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 65/2026 The court convicted respondent Karabhai Arjanbhai Parmar under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternate imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court, relying on precedent and considering the accused's plea of guilt and impoverished circumstances, granted him the opportunity for reformation while imposing the minimal prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case