Government of Gujarat vs PRATAPBHAI GOVINDBHAI MARU — 64/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000752026

Filing Number

64/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250924

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRATAPBHAI GOVINDBHAI MARU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Pratapbhai Govindbhai Maru under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 64(1)(b) for unlawful possession of alcohol. Considering the accused's plea of guilty, his poor economic circumstances, family dependence, and the impact of conviction on his household, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or two days simple imprisonment in default, exercising judicial discretion to impose a reduced sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Pratapbhai Govindbhai Maru under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 64(1)(b) for unlawful possession of alcohol. Considering the accused's plea of guilty, his poor economic circumstances, family dependence, and the impact of conviction on his household, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 or two days simple imprisonment in default, exercising judicial discretion to impose a reduced sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case