Government of Gujarat vs KISHORBHAI PUNJABHAI AJAKIYA — 63/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080000742026
Filing Number
63/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250899
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KISHORBHAI PUNJABHAI AJAKIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 63/2026 Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: Kishorbhai Punjabhai Ajakiya The court convicted the respondent under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 or seven days simple imprisonment in default. The court granted the respondent the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering his status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his willingness for reform. All confiscated items, vehicles, cash, and bonds were ordered to be forfeited or disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 63/2026 Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: Kishorbhai Punjabhai Ajakiya The court convicted the respondent under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 or seven days simple imprisonment in default. The court granted the respondent the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering his status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his willingness for reform. All confiscated items, vehicles, cash, and bonds were ordered to be forfeited or disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts