Government of Gujarat vs KISHORBHAI PUNJABHAI AJAKIYA — 63/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000742026

Filing Number

63/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

63/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250899

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KISHORBHAI PUNJABHAI AJAKIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 63/2026 Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: Kishorbhai Punjabhai Ajakiya The court convicted the respondent under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 or seven days simple imprisonment in default. The court granted the respondent the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering his status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his willingness for reform. All confiscated items, vehicles, cash, and bonds were ordered to be forfeited or disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 63/2026 Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: Kishorbhai Punjabhai Ajakiya The court convicted the respondent under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 or seven days simple imprisonment in default. The court granted the respondent the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering his status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his willingness for reform. All confiscated items, vehicles, cash, and bonds were ordered to be forfeited or disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case