Government of Gujarat vs KISHORBHAI PUNJABHAI AJAKIYA — 63/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 22nd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000742026

Case disposed

Filing Number

63/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

63/2026

Registration Date

05-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250899

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KISHORBHAI PUNJABHAI AJAKIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

22-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

17-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
ORDER

Summary of Case 63/2026 Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: Kishorbhai Punjabhai Ajakiya The court convicted the respondent under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 or seven days simple imprisonment in default. The court granted the respondent the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering his status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his willingness for reform. All confiscated items, vehicles, cash, and bonds were ordered to be forfeited or disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 63/2026 Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: Kishorbhai Punjabhai Ajakiya The court convicted the respondent under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 or seven days simple imprisonment in default. The court granted the respondent the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering his status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his willingness for reform. All confiscated items, vehicles, cash, and bonds were ordered to be forfeited or disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case