Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI SOMABHAI RATHOD Advocate - R L SOLANKI — 60/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000712026

Case disposed

Filing Number

60/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

60/2026

Registration Date

05-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250891

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAMESHBHAI SOMABHAI RATHOD Advocate - R L SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

17-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused Rameshbhai Somabhai Rathod under Section 55(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 2 days' simple imprisonment in default), while also ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles. The court found the accused guilty of possessing illicit liquor based on the voluntary confession and evidence, and determined that reformation was possible given his poor economic circumstances and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Rameshbhai Somabhai Rathod under Section 55(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 2 days' simple imprisonment in default), while also ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles. The court found the accused guilty of possessing illicit liquor based on the voluntary confession and evidence, and determined that reformation was possible given his poor economic circumstances and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case