Government of Gujarat vs MAYURBHAI BHANUBHAI RATHOD — 59/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000702026

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

59/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250890

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAYURBHAI BHANUBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Mayurbhai Bhanubhai Rathod under Section 56(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or, in default, two days' simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's plea that he belonged to a poor class with family responsibilities and granted him the benefit of probation, imposing the minimal penalty while ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Mayurbhai Bhanubhai Rathod under Section 56(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or, in default, two days' simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's plea that he belonged to a poor class with family responsibilities and granted him the benefit of probation, imposing the minimal penalty while ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case