Government of Gujarat vs THARANBHAI BHURABHAI SISODIYA — 55/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000662026

Filing Number

55/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250529

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THARANBHAI BHURABHAI SISODIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for possession of liquor but granted him a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the prescribed punishment, considering his poverty, unawareness of law, family's economic dependence on him, and the potential hardship on his entire family. The court imposed an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) for possession of liquor but granted him a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 fine instead of the prescribed punishment, considering his poverty, unawareness of law, family's economic dependence on him, and the potential hardship on his entire family. The court imposed an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case