Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI MENSIBHAI PARMAR — 50/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000582026

Filing Number

50/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

50/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250835

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINODBHAI MENSIBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused Vinodrai Meghlal Parmar under Section 275 of the IPC and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his plea for reformation, ultimately granting him the benefit of doubt based on the established legal precedent in Gujarat State v. Natwarsingh Harchandi Thakor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused Vinodrai Meghlal Parmar under Section 275 of the IPC and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's status as a poor person with family responsibilities and his plea for reformation, ultimately granting him the benefit of doubt based on the established legal precedent in Gujarat State v. Natwarsingh Harchandi Thakor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case