Government of Gujarat vs JUMMASHA GARIBSHA SHAHMDAR Advocate - A C RANINGA — 30/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080000382026

Filing Number

30/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030240711

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUMMASHA GARIBSHA SHAHMDAR Advocate - A C RANINGA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under Section 56(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100.05 or, in default, simple imprisonment for two days. The court found the accused guilty of the offense based on the voluntary confession and the evidence presented, while considering his economic hardship and granting him the benefit of reformation as a first-time offender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 56(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100.05 or, in default, simple imprisonment for two days. The court found the accused guilty of the offense based on the voluntary confession and the evidence presented, while considering his economic hardship and granting him the benefit of reformation as a first-time offender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case