Government of Gujarat vs MANJUBEN MANSHUKHBHAI RATHOD — 11/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080000192026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250743
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANJUBEN MANSHUKHBHAI RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 11/2026 The court convicted Manjuben Manshukhbhai Rathod under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for student misconduct and sentenced her to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500, or in default, two days simple imprisonment. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's illiteracy, poverty, status as the sole breadwinner of her family, and potential economic hardship from regular court appearances, imposing a lenient sentence while applying precedent from established sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 11/2026 The court convicted Manjuben Manshukhbhai Rathod under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for student misconduct and sentenced her to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500, or in default, two days simple imprisonment. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's illiteracy, poverty, status as the sole breadwinner of her family, and potential economic hardship from regular court appearances, imposing a lenient sentence while applying precedent from established sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts