Government of Gujarat vs AVKASHBHAI KISHANBHAI SUKHADIYA — 1109/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B, 85. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN070015932025
Filing Number
1109/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
1109/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203005250162
Police Station
MANGROL MARINE POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AVKASHBHAI KISHANBHAI SUKHADIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted Avkashbhai Kishanbhai Sukhadiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85, finding him guilty of prohibition-related offenses. The accused voluntarily admitted to the charges, citing his status as a first-time offender with family dependents, prompting the court to impose lenient sentencing. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200, with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered confiscation of prohibited materials seized in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1109/2025
The court convicted Avkashbhai Kishanbhai Sukhadiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85, finding him guilty of prohibition-related offenses. The accused voluntarily admitted to the charges, citing his status as a first-time offender with family dependents, prompting the court to impose lenient sentencing. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200, with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered confiscation of prohibited materials seized in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts