Government of Gujarat vs AJAYBHAI TULSIBHAI MASANI — 878/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN070012522025

Filing Number

878/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

878/2025

Registration Date

23-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203005250149

Police Station

MANGROL MARINE POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAYBHAI TULSIBHAI MASANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found Ajaybhai Tulsibhai Masani guilty of violations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) and 85. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the crime and was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative sentence of 2 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid; seized prohibited materials were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 31-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 878/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court found Ajaybhai Tulsibhai Masani guilty of violations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) and 85. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the crime and was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative sentence of 2 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid; seized prohibited materials were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case