Government of Gujarat vs KALPESH MOHABATSINH CHUDASAMA Advocate - K J PARMAR — 555/2023

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN070007512023

Filing Number

555/2023

Filing Date

05-May-2023

Registration No

555/2023

Registration Date

05-May-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203005230020

Police Station

MANGROL MARINE POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALPESH MOHABATSINH CHUDASAMA Advocate - K J PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted defendant Kalpesh Mohamtsingh Chudasama of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that the crucial panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the recovery of illicit liquor, and without independent witness support for the seizure, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 30-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  13. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  14. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  15. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  16. 27-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  17. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  18. 09-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  19. 09-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge

  20. 03-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 05-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 555/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted defendant Kalpesh Mohamtsingh Chudasama of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that the crucial panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the recovery of illicit liquor, and without independent witness support for the seizure, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case