Government of Gujarat vs KALPESH MOHABATSINH CHUDASAMA Advocate - K J PARMAR — 555/2023
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN070007512023
Filing Number
555/2023
Filing Date
05-May-2023
Registration No
555/2023
Registration Date
05-May-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203005230020
Police Station
MANGROL MARINE POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALPESH MOHABATSINH CHUDASAMA Advocate - K J PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The court acquitted defendant Kalpesh Mohamtsingh Chudasama of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that the crucial panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the recovery of illicit liquor, and without independent witness support for the seizure, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
27-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
09-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
09-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
03-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 555/2023
Summary The court acquitted defendant Kalpesh Mohamtsingh Chudasama of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that the crucial panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the recovery of illicit liquor, and without independent witness support for the seizure, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts