Government of Gujarat vs VANRAJ URFE JALPESH MANOJBHAI PARMAR — 287/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN070003882025
Filing Number
287/2025
Filing Date
13-Mar-2025
Registration No
287/2025
Registration Date
13-Mar-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203038240531
Police Station
MANGROL POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VANRAJ URFE JALPESH MANOJBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The Mangrol Judicial Magistrate Court stopped proceedings against accused Vanraj Urfe Jalpesh Manojbhai Parmar under BNSS 2023 Section 281 due to the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite continuous process issuance and service attempts. The court discharged the accused, canceled bail bonds, and forfeited any cash bail, finding no reasonable basis to continue trial given the prosecution's inability to produce the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 287/2025
The Mangrol Judicial Magistrate Court stopped proceedings against accused Vanraj Urfe Jalpesh Manojbhai Parmar under BNSS 2023 Section 281 due to the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite continuous process issuance and service attempts. The court discharged the accused, canceled bail bonds, and forfeited any cash bail, finding no reasonable basis to continue trial given the prosecution's inability to produce the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts