Government of Gujarat vs AARIF @ BHURO YUSUFBHAI GAMBHIR Advocate - C R BHARADA — 1533/2022
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060016712022
Filing Number
1533/2022
Filing Date
10-08-2022
Registration No
1533/2022
Registration Date
10-08-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203036220090
Police Station
MALIYA HATINA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AARIF @ BHURO YUSUFBHAI GAMBHIR Advocate - C R BHARADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1533/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Hirenabhai Prabhu Sejpal, Prabul Lalitakumar Tanna, and Aarif Ushrabhai Gambhir) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession and sale of alcohol. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient witness testimony, procedural irregularities, and lack of independent corroboration of the seized liquor evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1533/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Hirenabhai Prabhu Sejpal, Prabul Lalitakumar Tanna, and Aarif Ushrabhai Gambhir) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession and sale of alcohol. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient witness testimony, procedural irregularities, and lack of independent corroboration of the seized liquor evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts