JASUBEN BHIMABHAI VASAN vs BHIKHABHAI JINABHAI VASAN Advocate - R V BHALGARIYA — 97/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN060014262023

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

97/2023

Filing Date

18-08-2023

Registration No

97/2023

Registration Date

18-08-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36

Petitioner(s)

JASUBEN BHIMABHAI VASAN

Adv. K K SUTREJA

MUKESHBHAI BHIMABHAI VASAN

Adv. K K SUTREJA

KANJIBHAI BHIMABHAI VASAN

Adv. K K SUTREJA

LILAVANTIBEN BHIMABHAI VASAN

Adv. K K SUTREJA

INDUBEN BHIMABHAI VASAN

Adv. K K SUTREJA

ILABEN BHIMABHAI VASAN

Adv. K K SUTREJA

Respondent(s)

BHIKHABHAI JINABHAI VASAN Advocate - R V BHALGARIYA

AMITBHAI BHIKHABHAI VASAN

Adv. R V BHALGARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

01-05-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

16-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

28-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

10-10-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

25-09-2024
ORDER

Case Summary: RCS 97/2023 Court: Principal Civil Court, Maliya Hatina Petitioners: Jasuben Bhimabhai Vasan, Mukeshbhai Bhimabhai Vasan, Kanjibhai Bhimabhai Vasan Respondents: Bhikhabhai Jinabhai Vasan and Amitbhai Bhikhabhai Vasan Outcome: The petition for interim/mandatory injunction was dismissed. The court denied the petitioners' request for a court order preventing the respondents from obstructing their access to their agricultural land and passage route. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish their case as a primary suit, and therefore could not obtain the relief sought through injunction proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 97/2023 Court: Principal Civil Court, Maliya Hatina Petitioners: Jasuben Bhimabhai Vasan, Mukeshbhai Bhimabhai Vasan, Kanjibhai Bhimabhai Vasan Respondents: Bhikhabhai Jinabhai Vasan and Amitbhai Bhikhabhai Vasan Outcome: The petition for interim/mandatory injunction was dismissed. The court denied the petitioners' request for a court order preventing the respondents from obstructing their access to their agricultural land and passage route. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish their case as a primary suit, and therefore could not obtain the relief sought through injunction proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case