Government of Gujarat vs BIPINJATI MOHANAJATI GAUSWAMI Advocate - C R BHARADA — 925/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060013212024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
925/2024
Filing Date
19-11-2024
Registration No
925/2024
Registration Date
19-11-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BIPINJATI MOHANAJATI GAUSWAMI Advocate - C R BHARADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 06-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 04-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 30-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act for possessing illicit alcohol, but imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status, family responsibilities, and that it was his first offense. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment for one day (time already served) with a fine, applying discretionary mitigation principles established under Gujarat High Court precedent to balance justice with the accused's rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act for possessing illicit alcohol, but imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status, family responsibilities, and that it was his first offense. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment for one day (time already served) with a fine, applying discretionary mitigation principles established under Gujarat High Court precedent to balance justice with the accused's rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts