PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD SUB DIVISION OFFICE MALIYA HATINA vs VAGHELA KIRITBHAI BHANABHAI — 53/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN060009462025

Filing Number

53/2025

Filing Date

06-Oct-2025

Registration No

53/2025

Registration Date

06-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD SUB DIVISION OFFICE MALIYA HATINA

    Adv. H N MAHIDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VAGHELA KIRITBHAI BHANABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Maliya High Court approved a settlement petition (Case No. GJ01456) filed under Article 08, finding the settlement legally valid and binding on both parties. The court ordered the decree be executed in accordance with the settlement, directed court fees be refunded to the plaintiff, and ruled each party bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Maliya High Court approved a settlement petition (Case No. GJ01456) filed under Article 08, finding the settlement legally valid and binding on both parties. The court ordered the decree be executed in accordance with the settlement, directed court fees be refunded to the plaintiff, and ruled each party bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case