Government of Gujarat vs RIZVAN RAFIKBHAI MIGAL — 621/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060008972024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
621/2024
Filing Date
06-08-2024
Registration No
621/2024
Registration Date
06-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RIZVAN RAFIKBHAI MIGAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 04-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 12-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court ordered the discharge of the accused Rijvan Rafik Bhai Mughal under Section 281 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, finding that the prosecution failed to present him despite multiple summons issued over a prolonged period, and no satisfactory or valid reason was provided for his absence. The court further directed that if the accused is found in the future, the prosecution may resume proceedings before the competent court, as the case had become a deadlocked stock matter unnecessarily burdening the judicial system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court ordered the discharge of the accused Rijvan Rafik Bhai Mughal under Section 281 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, finding that the prosecution failed to present him despite multiple summons issued over a prolonged period, and no satisfactory or valid reason was provided for his absence. The court further directed that if the accused is found in the future, the prosecution may resume proceedings before the competent court, as the case had become a deadlocked stock matter unnecessarily burdening the judicial system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts