Government of Gujarat vs DIVYESHBHAI NILESHBHAI BHARDA Advocate - U L MAKVANA — 593/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 336,114. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060008692024
Filing Number
593/2024
Filing Date
03-08-2024
Registration No
593/2024
Registration Date
03-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203036240142
Police Station
MALIYA HATINA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DIVYESHBHAI NILESHBHAI BHARDA Advocate - U L MAKVANA
OMBHAI ASHOKBHAI DANTI
Adv. U L MAKVANA
VIJAYBHAI KHIMJIBHAI RAHOD
Adv. C R BHARADA
RAVIBHAI @ BADSAH HEMANTBHAI CHANDAPA
Adv. U L MAKVANA
SAGARBHAI MANOJBHAI CHUDASMA
Adv. C R BHARADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 336/114 for criminal negligence and imposed a fine of Rs. 1,500 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 months. However, considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offence, and remorse, the court exercised mercy in sentencing while maintaining the reformative purpose of criminal law, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 336/114 for criminal negligence and imposed a fine of Rs. 1,500 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 months. However, considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offence, and remorse, the court exercised mercy in sentencing while maintaining the reformative purpose of criminal law, balancing justice with humanitarian considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts