STATE BANK OF INDIA KHORASA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER vs PUNJABHAI KANABHAI CHAVDA — 10/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 18th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJJN060006632025
Filing Number
10/2025
Filing Date
10-07-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
10-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BANK OF INDIA KHORASA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER
Adv. M S GOHEL
Respondent(s)
PUNJABHAI KANABHAI CHAVDA
PALABHAI KANABHAI CHAVDA
KARSHANBHAI KANABHAI CHAVDA
KUVARBEN KANABHAI CHAVDA
PANCHIBEN KANABHAI CHAVDA
DEVAYBEN KANABHAI CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 18-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 23-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dismissed State Bank of India's case against the three respondents for default. Despite multiple adjournments and extensions granted to the bank to recover the outstanding loan amount, the bank failed to provide any information about the respondents' immovable property or take any concrete recovery action. The court found it evident from the record that the bank had no interest in pursuing the case further and dismissed it for default due to the bank's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court dismissed State Bank of India's case against the three respondents for default. Despite multiple adjournments and extensions granted to the bank to recover the outstanding loan amount, the bank failed to provide any information about the respondents' immovable property or take any concrete recovery action. The court found it evident from the record that the bank had no interest in pursuing the case further and dismissed it for default due to the bank's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts