RASILABEN MANSUKHBHAI CHUDASAMA vs MANSUKHABHAI HIRABHAI CHUDAMA Advocate - U L MAKVANA — 42/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 20(6). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJN060006032025
Filing Number
42/2025
Filing Date
05-Jul-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
05-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RASILABEN MANSUKHBHAI CHUDASAMA
Adv. A D JORA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANSUKHABHAI HIRABHAI CHUDAMA Advocate - U L MAKVANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The National Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition filed by an advocate regarding alleged irregularities in Article 18 video proceedings has been disposed of, with the court finding that both parties reached a settlement and no further action is required from the appellant. The court consequently ordered the dismissal of the appeal with costs imposed on the petitioner, as per the judgment dated March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Recovery Warrant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Recovery Warrant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Recovery Warrant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2026
Recovery Warrant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Recovery Warrant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
Recovery Warrant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2025
The National Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition filed by an advocate regarding alleged irregularities in Article 18 video proceedings has been disposed of, with the court finding that both parties reached a settlement and no further action is required from the appellant. The court consequently ordered the dismissal of the appeal with costs imposed on the petitioner, as per the judgment dated March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts