Government of Gujarat vs bipinjati mohanjati gousvami Advocate - C R BHARADA — 328/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN060005592024

Filing Number

328/2024

Filing Date

27-May-2024

Registration No

328/2024

Registration Date

27-May-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.bipinjati mohanjati gousvami Advocate - C R BHARADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act but imposed minimum sentence considering mitigating circumstances. The court found the accused guilty but noted his poor economic condition, that he is the sole earning family member with dependents, this being his first offense, and his remorse; therefore, sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for the period already undergone in jail with fine, rather than imposing the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 30-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 12-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 08-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 11-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 02-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 18-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 08-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 03-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 14-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 13-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 11-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 14-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 11-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 22-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 19-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 27-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 328/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act but imposed minimum sentence considering mitigating circumstances. The court found the accused guilty but noted his poor economic condition, that he is the sole earning family member with dependents, this being his first offense, and his remorse; therefore, sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for the period already undergone in jail with fine, rather than imposing the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case