Government of Gujarat vs bipinjati mohanjati gousvami Advocate - C R BHARADA — 328/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060005592024
Filing Number
328/2024
Filing Date
27-May-2024
Registration No
328/2024
Registration Date
27-May-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.bipinjati mohanjati gousvami Advocate - C R BHARADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act but imposed minimum sentence considering mitigating circumstances. The court found the accused guilty but noted his poor economic condition, that he is the sole earning family member with dependents, this being his first offense, and his remorse; therefore, sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for the period already undergone in jail with fine, rather than imposing the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Nov-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 328/2024
Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act but imposed minimum sentence considering mitigating circumstances. The court found the accused guilty but noted his poor economic condition, that he is the sole earning family member with dependents, this being his first offense, and his remorse; therefore, sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for the period already undergone in jail with fine, rather than imposing the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts