Government of Gujarat vs ASIFBHAI JUSABBHAI DAL Advocate - C R BHARADA — 406/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN060005002025

Filing Number

406/2025

Filing Date

13-May-2025

Registration No

406/2025

Registration Date

13-May-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203012250040

Police Station

CHORWAD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASIFBHAI JUSABBHAI DAL Advocate - C R BHARADA

  2. 2.SOHELBHAI ABDULSATARBHAI MALEK

    Adv. C R BHARADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 406/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Asifbhai Jusabbhai Dal and Sohelbhai Abdulsatarbhai Malek) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(B), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration and contradictions existed in the evidence presented. Key Reasoning: The judge applied established jurisprudence that when no prospect of conviction exists, court time should not be wasted on formal trial completion. The evidence of physical injury claimed by the petitioner was insufficient, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the accused's statements denying involvement remained uncontradicted by credible prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 30-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 19-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 06-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 23-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 13-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 406/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 406/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Asifbhai Jusabbhai Dal and Sohelbhai Abdulsatarbhai Malek) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(B), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration and contradictions existed in the evidence presented. Key Reasoning: The judge applied established jurisprudence that when no prospect of conviction exists, court time should not be wasted on formal trial completion. The evidence of physical injury claimed by the petitioner was insufficient, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the accused's statements denying involvement remained uncontradicted by credible prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case