Government of Gujarat vs ASIFBHAI JUSABBHAI DAL Advocate - C R BHARADA — 406/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN060005002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

406/2025

Filing Date

13-05-2025

Registration No

406/2025

Registration Date

13-05-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203012250040

Police Station

CHORWAD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ASIFBHAI JUSABBHAI DAL Advocate - C R BHARADA

SOHELBHAI ABDULSATARBHAI MALEK

Adv. C R BHARADA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

28-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

04-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 406/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Asifbhai Jusabbhai Dal and Sohelbhai Abdulsatarbhai Malek) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(B), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration and contradictions existed in the evidence presented. Key Reasoning: The judge applied established jurisprudence that when no prospect of conviction exists, court time should not be wasted on formal trial completion. The evidence of physical injury claimed by the petitioner was insufficient, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the accused's statements denying involvement remained uncontradicted by credible prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 406/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Asifbhai Jusabbhai Dal and Sohelbhai Abdulsatarbhai Malek) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(B), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration and contradictions existed in the evidence presented. Key Reasoning: The judge applied established jurisprudence that when no prospect of conviction exists, court time should not be wasted on formal trial completion. The evidence of physical injury claimed by the petitioner was insufficient, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the accused's statements denying involvement remained uncontradicted by credible prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case