Government of Gujarat vs ASIFBHAI JUSABBHAI DAL Advocate - C R BHARADA — 406/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060005002025
Filing Number
406/2025
Filing Date
13-05-2025
Registration No
406/2025
Registration Date
13-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203012250040
Police Station
CHORWAD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASIFBHAI JUSABBHAI DAL Advocate - C R BHARADA
SOHELBHAI ABDULSATARBHAI MALEK
Adv. C R BHARADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 04-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 406/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Asifbhai Jusabbhai Dal and Sohelbhai Abdulsatarbhai Malek) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(B), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration and contradictions existed in the evidence presented. Key Reasoning: The judge applied established jurisprudence that when no prospect of conviction exists, court time should not be wasted on formal trial completion. The evidence of physical injury claimed by the petitioner was insufficient, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the accused's statements denying involvement remained uncontradicted by credible prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 406/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Asifbhai Jusabbhai Dal and Sohelbhai Abdulsatarbhai Malek) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(B), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration and contradictions existed in the evidence presented. Key Reasoning: The judge applied established jurisprudence that when no prospect of conviction exists, court time should not be wasted on formal trial completion. The evidence of physical injury claimed by the petitioner was insufficient, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the accused's statements denying involvement remained uncontradicted by credible prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts