PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD SUB DIVISION OFFICE CHORWAD vs JADAVBHAI VARJANGBHAI CHUDASAMA — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 12th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJJN060002282025
Filing Number
3/2025
Filing Date
14-02-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
14-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD SUB DIVISION OFFICE CHORWAD
Adv. V M KANABAR
Respondent(s)
JADAVBHAI VARJANGBHAI CHUDASAMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 18-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 23-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 26-12-2025 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the suit for default against respondent Jadavbhai Varjangbhai Chudasama due to the petitioner company's repeated failure to prosecute the case diligently. Although the court had granted the petitioner time to recover outstanding dues and property details from the respondent, the petitioner consistently failed to appear and delayed proceedings at each hearing, warranting dismissal of the case for the petitioner's default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the suit for default against respondent Jadavbhai Varjangbhai Chudasama due to the petitioner company's repeated failure to prosecute the case diligently. Although the court had granted the petitioner time to recover outstanding dues and property details from the respondent, the petitioner consistently failed to appear and delayed proceedings at each hearing, warranting dismissal of the case for the petitioner's default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts