Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI KANABHAI PANDIT — 60/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060001222024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
60/2024
Filing Date
03-02-2024
Registration No
60/2024
Registration Date
03-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI KANABHAI PANDIT
JENTIBHAI LAKHAMANBHAI CHUDASAMA
Adv. C R BHARADA
RAJESHBHAI @ RAJU BACHUBHAI VADHER
Adv. C R BHARADA
RAJUBHAI @ GATO CHINABHAI CHUDASAMA
Adv. C R BHARADA
NARSHIBHAI KANABHAI BARIYA
Adv. C R BHARADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 11-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 04-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 12 (gambling) after they filed a voluntary confession. The court exercised mercy considering the defendants' impoverished background, their remorse, and the reformative purpose of sentencing, thereby granting them benefit of the doubt and imposing a lenient fine of ₹500 each instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 12 (gambling) after they filed a voluntary confession. The court exercised mercy considering the defendants' impoverished background, their remorse, and the reformative purpose of sentencing, thereby granting them benefit of the doubt and imposing a lenient fine of ₹500 each instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts