Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI KANABHAI PANDIT — 60/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN060001222024

Filing Number

60/2024

Filing Date

03-Feb-2024

Registration No

60/2024

Registration Date

03-Feb-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI KANABHAI PANDIT

  2. 2.JENTIBHAI LAKHAMANBHAI CHUDASAMA

    Adv. C R BHARADA

  3. 3.RAJESHBHAI @ RAJU BACHUBHAI VADHER

    Adv. C R BHARADA

  4. 4.RAJUBHAI @ GATO CHINABHAI CHUDASAMA

    Adv. C R BHARADA

  5. 5.NARSHIBHAI KANABHAI BARIYA

    Adv. C R BHARADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court acquitted five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 12 (gambling) after they filed a voluntary confession. The court exercised mercy considering the defendants' impoverished background, their remorse, and the reformative purpose of sentencing, thereby granting them benefit of the doubt and imposing a lenient fine of ₹500 each instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 08-Aug-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 05-Jul-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 03-Jun-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 08-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 29-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 14-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 13-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 14-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 13-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 29-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 09-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 05-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 01-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 20-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 03-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 12 (gambling) after they filed a voluntary confession. The court exercised mercy considering the defendants' impoverished background, their remorse, and the reformative purpose of sentencing, thereby granting them benefit of the doubt and imposing a lenient fine of ₹500 each instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case