RAKESHBHAI MADHUBHAI MAKAWANA vs DHARMENDRAKUMAR NARESHBHAI PATEL — 84/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN060001052023
Filing Number
84/2023
Filing Date
20-01-2023
Registration No
84/2023
Registration Date
20-01-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAKESHBHAI MADHUBHAI MAKAWANA
Adv. H P KHANIA
Respondent(s)
DHARMENDRAKUMAR NARESHBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 11-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 84/2023 - Rakeshbhai Madhubhai Makawana v. Dharmendrakumar Nareshbhai Patel The court dismissed the petition filed by petitioner Rakeshbhai Madhubhai Makawana due to gross negligence and abandonment by the petitioner's side. Despite sufficient opportunities provided by the court, the petitioner failed to file a fresh affidavit or produce supporting evidence regarding the respondent's conduct branch, and the petitioner remained absent from proceedings. The court ordered the dismissal of the petition with liberty to discharge the accused, applying precedent that prolonged inaction and lack of diligent prosecution warrant dismissal in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 84/2023 - Rakeshbhai Madhubhai Makawana v. Dharmendrakumar Nareshbhai Patel The court dismissed the petition filed by petitioner Rakeshbhai Madhubhai Makawana due to gross negligence and abandonment by the petitioner's side. Despite sufficient opportunities provided by the court, the petitioner failed to file a fresh affidavit or produce supporting evidence regarding the respondent's conduct branch, and the petitioner remained absent from proceedings. The court ordered the dismissal of the petition with liberty to discharge the accused, applying precedent that prolonged inaction and lack of diligent prosecution warrant dismissal in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts