STATE BANK OF INDIA KHORASA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER vs RAMSHIBHAI KANABHAI NANDANIYA — 1/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJJN060000452024

Filing Number

1/2024

Filing Date

08-Jan-2024

Registration No

1/2024

Registration Date

08-Jan-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA KHORASA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER

    Adv. M S GOHEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMSHIBHAI KANABHAI NANDANIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court dismissed both recovery cases (Reg. Civ. Suit 1/2024 and 5/2024) filed by State Bank of India against Ramshibhai Kanabhai Nandaniya due to the bank's gross misconduct and non-compliance with court orders. The bank's branch manager failed to appear despite multiple summons over seven months, instructed his legal counsel to provide evasive responses, and cited work commitments as a reason for non-attendance, demonstrating contempt of court. The court found the bank's conduct serious enough to warrant dismissal of both suits, release of attached property, and initiation of contempt proceedings against the branch manager. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 18-Oct-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 02-Sep-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 10-Jun-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 09-May-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 02-Apr-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 17-Jan-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 20-Dec-2024

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 27-Nov-2024

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 23-Oct-2024

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 17-Aug-2024

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 12-Jul-2024

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 07-Jun-2024

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 24-May-2024

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 19-Apr-2024

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 29-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 08-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed both recovery cases (Reg. Civ. Suit 1/2024 and 5/2024) filed by State Bank of India against Ramshibhai Kanabhai Nandaniya due to the bank's gross misconduct and non-compliance with court orders. The bank's branch manager failed to appear despite multiple summons over seven months, instructed his legal counsel to provide evasive responses, and cited work commitments as a reason for non-attendance, demonstrating contempt of court. The court found the bank's conduct serious enough to warrant dismissal of both suits, release of attached property, and initiation of contempt proceedings against the branch manager. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case